The Battlefield franchise is one of the most iconic in the world of video games, famous for its epic battles, vast maps and immersive tactical gameplay.
Since the release of the first title in 2002, the series has enchanted players with its intense combat experiences, whether in World War II scenarios, modern wars or even distilled future.
Over the years, Battlefield has gained a faithful fan base and has gained notoriety for innovating in the first -person shooter game, with emphasis on large -scale battles and gameplay that privileges teamwork.
However, not all titles in the series had the same positive impact. Some games, although expected with great enthusiasm, ended up receiving mixed or even negative criticism, especially for technical problems and design failures.
In this list, we ranked the Battlefield franchise games, from the most acclaimed to those who fell short of expectations, based on the notes received by critics and the community.
The worst games of the Battlefield franchise
Battlefield 4 | NOTE: 79

“Battlefield 4” hit the shelves with high expectations. The game brought a new graphic engine, the Frostbite 3, which promised to provide an impressive visual experience and greater interactivity with the scenarios, something that really materialized.
However, the release was not perfect. Many players faced bugs, server problems and crashes during the launch, which lasted the initial experience of the title.
Despite correcting these problems over time, the initial negative impact was strong enough to prevent the game from being remembered as one of the best in the franchise.
However, over time, Battlefield 4 has been improving and still has a good gameplay, especially for those who like large -scale fighting.
Battlefield Hardline | NOTE: 72

“Battlefield Hardline” tried something different by abandoning the traditional war scene in favor of a plot that revolved around a confrontation between police and criminals.
Although the game struggled to innovate, he failed to capture the essence that made Battlefield so dear to fans. Many players missed the large scale of battle and military tactics, and the plot centered on police and thieves seemed superficial compared to the depth of the other titles in the series.
In addition, the game mode did not bring significant news about what fans expected from the genre, which resulted in a weaker experience. The style of police combat eventually became repetitive, which made the game classified among the lowest in the series.
Battlefield Heroes | NOTE: 69

Launched in 2009, “Battlefield Heroes” was an EA attempt to enter the free gaming market with a cartoons and simplified gameplay.
Although it has a different style and was well received by some casual players, many longtime franchise fans felt that the game did not have the same appeal and depth as the series’ main titles.
The microtransation system was also a negative point, with criticism pointing that this impairs the experience for players who were unwilling to spend money.
In addition, the lack of a more serious way of combat and simplified mechanics resulted in a less challenging and immersive experience, which pushed the more hardcore players away.
Battlefield Play4Free | NOTE: 68

Launched in 2011, “Battlefield Play4free” was a freemium version of the franchise, with simplified game mechanics available to play directly on the browser.
Although it offered free access, the title could not capture the charm of the main games of the series. The game was widely criticized for having lower graphics and gameplay to paid franchise titles, as well as aggressive monetization that forced players to spend money to get a competitive advantage.
Even with a growing players base, Battlefield Play4Free has never been able to meet quality expectations associated with the name Battlefield.
BATTLEFIELD 2042 | NOTE: 65

The franchise’s latest title, “Battlefield 2042”, was released with high expectations, but became one of the most controversial games in the series.
The game promised a new era of large -scale battles with up to 128 simultaneous players, dynamic maps and new features, such as tornadoes and sand storms.
However, many technical problems and design failures have affected the game’s reception, and the launch was marked by unstable servers, balancing problems and inconsistent gameplay.
The criticism pointed out that, despite the great scale of battles, the title could not capture Battlefield’s unique experience, with a lack of depth in game mechanics.
In addition, the absence of a single-player campaign and the absence of fans-loved characteristics, such as the destructible, was also widely criticized.
The best games in the Battlefield franchise
Battlefield 1 | NOTE: 87

Launched in 2016, “Battlefield 1” took players to World War I, a scenario little explored in video games. With a focus on intense and exciting combat, the title brought a unique experience with weapons and vehicles of the time, such as planes and old tanks.
Multiplayer mode has been acclaimed, with large dynamic and well -designed map battles. The Single-Player campaign was also one of the best in the series, with exciting stories that showed the brutality and humanity of conflict. “Battlefield 1” has managed to balance innovation and tradition, becoming one of the franchise’s most praised titles.
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 | NOTE: 88

“Bad Company 2” was a milestone in the franchise, with a more focus on dynamic combat and mood, which distanced itself from the most serious approach to previous titles.
The game brought great innovations, including real -time destruction of scenarios, which allowed players to create new forms of combat and open new paths during battles.
Multiplayer mode was also one of the most acclaimed in the series, with vast maps and varied game modes. The success of “Bad Company 2” has helped consolidate Battlefield as one of the biggest names in first -person shooter games.
Battlefield 3 | NOTE: 89

Launched in 2011, “Battlefield 3” took the franchise to a new graphic and technical level. Using Frostbite 2, the game was acclaimed by its impressive charts and its tactical gameplay, which required teamwork and communication between players.
The Single-Player campaign was more elaborated, although the main focus was still the multiplayer, which became the strong point of the title. “Battlefield 3” managed to refine the combat mechanics and presented a variety of maps that favored different game styles, making it one of the best in the series.
Battlefield 1942 | NOTE: 89

The game that started everything, “Battlefield 1942” was released in 2002 and introduced the idea of large -scale battles, with a significant focus on vehicles and combat in various scenarios of World War II.
Innovation was the key to the success of this title, which established a new standard for war games. The possibility of choosing between different classes and participating in battles at sea, air and on land made “Battlefield 1942” a revolutionary game for its time. Solid gameplay and dynamic maps are still lovingly remembered by fans.
Battlefield 2 | NOTE: 91

Launched in 2005, “Battlefield 2” is considered by many to be one of the best titles in the series. The game brought refined gameplay and a large -scale experience that defined the franchise. Its large maps, combined with the possibility of using various types of vehicles and tactical strategies, made it one of the most iconic first-person shooting games of the time.
The addition of ways such as air combat and the possibility of customizing the equipment gave the title an unprecedented immersion, ensuring a prominent place in the Battlefield franchise.